top of page
Introduction To Captives
Deductible Reimbursement Captive Strategy

•A captive insurance company structured to reimburse its parent company for a portion of the deductibles that they pay in their primary policies

•Efficient way for the parent company or group of companies to manage the costs associated with their insurance deductibles

•In a loss, primary insurance responds first, with the captive reimbursing the parent company for deductibles paid

DRIP.png
DRIP
Pure Captive Strategy

•A captive insurance company that provides coverage for the risks of its parent company

•Provides a cost-effective solution for managing the risks faced by the parent company

Pure.png
Pure Captive
Group Captive Strategy

•A captive insurance company that provides coverage for the risks of a group of companies that are seeking to pool their risks together

•Each member company retains control over its own insurance program, but also shares in the risk and reward of the group captive

•This allows for risk distribution where it could not have otherwise been achieved

Group.png
Group Captive
Pros and Cons of a Captive Insurance Company

Overall, the decision to form a captive insurance company requires careful consideration of the benefits and drawbacks, and a comprehensive understanding of the insurance and risk management landscape. It is important to seek the advice of experienced insurance professionals and legal advisors before embarking on this type of insurance arrangement.

PRO

CON

1.Cost Savings: By self-insuring through a captive insurance company, a parent company or group of companies can potentially reduce their overall insurance costs compared to purchasing insurance on the traditional commercial insurance market.

1.High Start-Up Costs: The formation and management of a captive insurance company can be expensive, with start-up costs that include legal fees, actuarial expenses, and regulatory costs.

2.Control Over Coverage: With a captive insurance company, the parent company or group of companies has complete control over their insurance program, including the design of coverage, selection of insurance providers, and the management of claims.

2.Complexity: The structure and operation of a captive insurance company can be complex, requiring specialized knowledge and expertise in insurance and risk management.

3.Improved Risk Management: By retaining a portion of their insurance risks through a captive insurance company, a parent company or group of companies can better manage their insurance risks and make informed decisions about risk mitigation and loss control.

4.Increased Flexibility: A captive insurance company can provide customized insurance coverage that is tailored to the specific needs of the parent company or group of companies, which is not always possible with traditional insurance.

5.Potential for Earnings: If the captive insurance company is managed effectively and its premiums are invested wisely, it can generate significant earnings that can be used to offset insurance costs and improve the financial performance of the parent company or group of companies.

3.Risk Retention: By retaining a portion of their insurance risks through a captive insurance company, a parent company or group of companies is assuming a significant amount of risk, which can be challenging and requires careful management.

4.Regulatory Challenges: Captive insurance companies are subject to regulatory oversight and must comply with state and federal insurance regulations, which can be time-consuming and costly to manage.

5.Potential for Losses: If the captive insurance company is not managed effectively or if its investments perform poorly, it can result in significant losses that can offset any potential cost savings.

Pros-Cons of Captives
shutterstock_582441187.jpg

Contact

Quick Links

Connect with us

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • Youtube
  • Instagram

© 2024 by Sequoia Risk Partners

bottom of page